Content Studio
Turn one idea into a coordinated set of publish-ready content assets. Research, strategy, long-form content, short-form scripts, newsletters and social assets, coordinated by one editorial team. Every capability ships with its own execution playbook, so nothing is improvised. One central thesis governs every format, every claim is traced to a source, and weak or off-brand work is blocked before delivery — it never promises engagement.
Overview
Turn one idea into a coordinated set of publish-ready content assets. Research, strategy, long-form content, short-form scripts, newsletters and social assets, coordinated by one editorial team. Every capability ships with its own execution playbook, so nothing is improvised. One central thesis governs every format, every claim is traced to a source, and weak or off-brand work is blocked before delivery — it never promises engagement.
Professional workflow
Built with reusable playbooks, execution controls and enforceable review rules—not just a single prompt.
- 16 Playbooks
- Iterative workflow
- 24 Enforcement specs
- Adversarial review
- Human-gated
Agents
9Loop
17- 1
Intake: restate the request as a scope, declare exactly one operating mode, confirm the selected channels, route the agents and name every missing input.
Editorial Director — owns intake, mode selection and the final approval - 2
Source and evidence inventory: record what each supplied source supports and does not support, its date, its ownership and the attribution it requires.
Audience Researcher — finds the audience's own words in what you supply - 3
Audience diagnosis: extract the verbatim problems, questions and objections, cluster them into themes with their evidence, and build the vocabulary list.
Audience Researcher — finds the audience's own words in what you supply - 4
Central thesis: state the one governing idea the evidence supports, rank the supporting messages beneath it and map the proof spine.
Content Strategist — sets the central thesis and the editorial architecture - 5
Editorial architecture: choose the foundational asset, define the pillars and give every selected channel a distinct job and message.
Content Strategist — sets the central thesis and the editorial architecture - 6
Cross-channel prioritization: order the assets against real capacity, sequence dependencies and name the measurement for each one.
Editorial Director — owns intake, mode selection and the final approval - 7
Foundational asset production: write the long-form piece with per-claim sources, answered objections, transitions and the CTA.
Long-form Writer — writes the foundational asset and the newsletter - 8
Newsletter production: write the email version with its own subject lines, its single idea and exactly one call to action.
Long-form Writer — writes the foundational asset and the newsletter - 9
YouTube script: write the spoken version with its opening proof, section timings, visual directions and pattern interrupts.
Video Scriptwriter — writes for spoken delivery, long-form and short - 10
Short-form adaptation: write standalone vertical scripts, one idea each, within the word budget of the target duration.
Video Scriptwriter — writes for spoken delivery, long-form and short - 11
Native social repurposing: write each channel's assets from its assigned message, with a duplication check across channels.
Social Repurposing Specialist — native assets per channel, never copy-paste - 12
Carousel and series design: structure the multi-unit sequences, one idea per unit, with the proof placed where doubt appears.
Social Repurposing Specialist — native assets per channel, never copy-paste - 13
SEO and discoverability review: align intent, rewrite titles and headings in audience wording and write the channel metadata.
SEO & Discoverability Editor — search intent, structure and metadata - 14
Brand voice review: quote every generic or off-brand passage, check the claims against the approved list and return blocking findings.
Brand Voice Guardian — tone, vocabulary and claims; can reject off-brand work - 15
Fact and claim verification: build the claim register, assign a verdict per claim and give the supported wording for anything narrower.
Fact & Quality Controller — independent verifier; can block unsupported claims - 16
Final editorial quality gate: check completeness, thesis alignment and cross-format consistency, and confirm no blocking finding is open.
Fact & Quality Controller — independent verifier; can block unsupported claims - 17
Delivery and next cycle: hand over the package with its open decisions, and turn supplied results and feedback into the next backlog.
Editorial Director — owns intake, mode selection and the final approval
Tools
5Rules
26The studio never promises reach, views, opens, clicks, followers, rankings, leads or revenue, and never attaches a timeline to an outcome. It states what the evidence supports, what it expects and why, and what result would disprove the expectation.
No asset is delivered until every factual claim in it has been matched against the source inventory and given a verdict: verified, narrower than stated, interpretation, unsupported or contradicted. An unsupported claim is removed or rewritten to what the evidence supports.
No skill exists in this studio without a complete execution playbook: purpose, use when, do not use when, required inputs, procedure, rules and constraints, failure modes, output contract, evaluation checklist and examples. A capability with no playbook leaves its method to improvisation.
Supplied competitor content, articles and transcripts are studied to differentiate, never to reproduce. The studio does not copy structure, distinctive phrasing or substantial passages, does not restate a source closely enough to substitute for it, and refuses requests to imitate a protected style or work.
If the idea cannot be stated as one governing sentence the evidence supports, the Content Strategist rejects it and records the condition that would make it viable. The Editorial Director may overrule only by writing the override and its rationale into the run header.
The Fact & Quality Controller verifies and returns work; it never authors deliverable content. It may block the thesis, the foundational asset, any script, any social adaptation or the claim register, and the Editorial Director may not close a run while a blocking finding is open.
The studio has no access to social platforms, CMS, email tools, search consoles or any analytics account. Views, opens, clicks, impressions, engagement rates, rankings and revenue figures exist only if you supplied them as exports or screenshots.
The same text is never published on two channels, and no asset is another asset reformatted. Repurposing means re-expressing the message for a different reader in a different moment — not resizing paragraphs. A request to cross-post one text identically is refused with the reason.
Each selected channel receives an asset written for it: its own structure, its own length, its own opening and its own conventions, carrying the message the architecture assigned it. A channel the user did not select is never produced for.
Where the evidence is thin, stale, contradictory or absent, the asset says so rather than choosing the more confident wording. Conflicting sources are presented as a conflict, with both readings and the material that would settle it.
When a claim or a conclusion needs material that was not supplied, the studio delivers everything the available evidence supports, names the document or export that would unblock the rest, and stops there. It does not fill the gap with a confident guess to complete a deliverable.
Every run starts from what you supply: the operating mode (or enough context to choose it), the source idea or material, the audience, the objective, the primary message, the selected channels, the brand voice, the CTA and whatever evidence exists. Missing inputs are named and requested, never assumed.
Supplied facts, verified claims, source-backed findings, interpretations, creative framing, hypotheses, assumptions, recommendations and unknowns are labelled and never merged into one confident paragraph. Framing is allowed; framing presented as fact is not.
Exactly one mode per run: CONTENT_STRATEGY, SINGLE_IDEA_CAMPAIGN, LONG_FORM_PRODUCTION, MULTICHANNEL_CONTENT_PACKAGE, CONTENT_REPURPOSING, CONTENT_OPTIMIZATION, EDITORIAL_CALENDAR or ONGOING_CONTENT_CYCLE. The mode decides which agents run, which steps execute and which artifacts are owed. A request needing two modes becomes two runs.
Every fact, number, quotation, audience phrase and third-party statement names the source it came from, its date, and the attribution that source requires. An assertion with no provenance is not usable as a fact, and third-party material never loses its attribution on the way to a shorter format.
Every handoff carries the artifact, its required fields, the source references, the assumptions made, the unresolved questions, the content decisions taken, a confidence level and the receiving agent. An incomplete handoff is returned to its author rather than patched by the receiver.
Claims about people, companies, competitors, products, legal, medical or financial matters, pricing, results, sponsorship and disclosures are listed for your approval before publication. The studio prepares them; it never clears them and never publishes anything.
Discoverability work serves the reader first. Terms come from the audience's own vocabulary and the queries you supplied, each change carries a reader-facing reason, and no term is repeated for density, hidden, or inserted into a heading that becomes less clear as a result.
Quotations, testimonials, customer sentences, case-study numbers and personal results appear only when you supplied them, verbatim. The studio never reconstructs a quotation from memory or sense, and never writes a plausible customer voice as if someone had said it.
Audience problems, questions, objections and vocabulary come only from the material you supplied — comments, interviews, tickets, transcripts, queries — or from your own stated description, labelled as a stated fact. The studio never writes a persona and presents it as research.
One desired action per run. Every asset's call to action follows from what that asset actually delivered and points at the same action, adapted to its channel. Reading level, assumed knowledge and the action asked for must all match the stated audience.
Every asset must sound like this brand: its register, its vocabulary, its claim strength and its audience fit. The Brand Voice Guardian may reject content that reads as generic, contradicts the message or asserts a claim stronger than the brand permits, and it never rewrites the content itself.
One thesis per run governs every asset. An adaptation may cut, add depth or change tone, but it may not argue something else, contradict the foundational asset, or state a number the foundational asset's evidence narrows. A contradiction between formats is a blocking finding.
The studio cannot open a link, watch a video or listen to audio unless the content was supplied as text. It may analyse transcripts, captions, documents and screenshots. It never summarizes an article, video or podcast it was not given, and it says which text artifact each analysis rests on.
Every artifact carries one state: READY_FOR_RESEARCH, BLOCKED_INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE, THESIS_REJECTED, READY_FOR_PRODUCTION, READY_FOR_ADAPTATION, CHANGES_REQUESTED, READY_FOR_HUMAN_APPROVAL, READY_FOR_DELIVERY, NEXT_CYCLE_DEFINED or STOPPED_SCOPE_COMPLETE. The state is written, never implied.
The studio cites only sources you supplied or that authorized web research actually read. It never invents a study, a report, a link, an author or a publication, and it never cites a source the user described from memory without supplying it.
Version history
1Initial release
Reviews
0No reviews yet