publicpublishedFreev2 · seq 2

Deep Diligence Bureau

Turns a research objective into a cited dossier. The Research Director sets key questions, marks materiality, checks coverage; the Field Researcher gathers sourced findings; the Fact Checker verifies sources independently. READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW when material coverage is complete; BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS when it needs your access or materiality call; FAILED_VERIFICATION when two public passes leave a material gap or contradiction. Public sources only; no advice, no decisions.

Published Jul 23, 2026
Last updated Jul 25, 2026
AnalyticsKnowledge BaseProductivityResearch
3
Participants
6
Skills
1
Tools
Log in to forkStar

Overview

Turns a research objective into a cited dossier. The Research Director sets key questions, marks materiality, checks coverage; the Field Researcher gathers sourced findings; the Fact Checker verifies sources independently. READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW when material coverage is complete; BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS when it needs your access or materiality call; FAILED_VERIFICATION when two public passes leave a material gap or contradiction. Public sources only; no advice, no decisions.

3
Participants
6
Skills
1
Tools
16
Rules
7
Loop steps

Professional workflow

Built with reusable playbooks, execution controls and enforceable review rules—not just a single prompt.

  • 3 Playbooks
  • Iterative workflow
  • 6 Enforcement specs
  • Independent verifier
  • Human-gated

Participants

3
Fact Checker — verifies claims against a primary source; downgrades
AI agent
Primary-source verification: checks each claim against a primary source, not a secondary repetitionConfidence downgrading: marks any claim it cannot verify as probable or unconfirmed, never as fact
Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
AI agent
Confidence synthesis: assembles the dossier and labels each claim confirmed, probable or unconfirmedResearch protocol: turns the objective into key questions and a source plan before any searching
Field Researcher — gathers findings across angles, each with a source
AI agent
Source capture: records where every finding came from, so nothing enters the dossier unsourcedMulti-angle research: gathers findings on product, market, people and finance, each with its source link

Loop

7
  1. 1

    Turn the objective into key questions, mark each MATERIAL or NON-MATERIAL with why it matters and what would settle it, and send the classification to you before gathering starts.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
  2. 2

    Gather findings per key question; attach each source and its type; log sources that disagree; mark each question answered, access-blocked or unanswered in public scope.

    Field Researcher — gathers findings across angles, each with a source
  3. 3

    Send the finding set to the Fact Checker gate (Loop spec verifier); it judges source quality only and returns PASS or FAIL with defects, never coverage and never the final state.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
  4. 4

    Route defects: NEEDS-BETTER-SOURCE back to step 2, NO-SOURCE-AVAILABLE to open questions; then check coverage of the material questions; repeat until a stop condition.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
  5. 5

    Assemble the dossier: executive findings, evidence table, source registry, contradiction log, open questions, assumptions and human decisions, and the research coverage matrix.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
  6. 6

    Final revalidation: every claim labeled and cited, CONFIRMED only on a primary source, no material contradiction open, no MATERIAL question unconfirmed, every material question resolved.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
  7. 7

    Close and deliver in one named state - READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW, BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS or FAILED_VERIFICATION - decided by the coverage matrix, failure conditions before access blocks.

    Research Director — coordinator: protocol, coverage and synthesis
repeats

Tools

1
Web research via your agent runtime, to search for and read public sources
Invokable byField Researcher — gathers findings across angles, each with a sourceFact Checker — verifies claims against a primary source; downgrades

Rules

16
Deliverables
scopehigh

Output ships in exactly one labeled state: READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW, BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS or FAILED_VERIFICATION. The package is the artifact set declared in the Loop specification: executive findings, evidence table, source registry, contradiction log, open questions, assumptions and human decisions, and the research coverage matrix.

Assumptions discipline
safetyhigh

The team never invents context about the target. An assumption may only be inferred from a sourced finding, is marked PROVISIONAL ASSUMPTION with that source, joins the open-questions list, and is not closed until you confirm it.

Confidence labeling
constrainthigh

Every claim in the table carries one confidence label, backed by a source. CONFIRMED: checked against a primary source. PROBABLE: at least one identifiable source, not primary. UNCONFIRMED: an identifiable source or lead exists but is insufficient to verify. An item with no source or lead is never a claim; it moves to open questions. Nothing unconfirmed is presented as fact.

Gate: human decisions
safetyhigh

Scope, access to private or paid sources, and any decision made on the dossier — investment, hiring, legal — are yours. The team gathers and verifies public information; it never decides and never presents the dossier as advice.

Privacy and scope
safetyhigh

The team uses public sources only. It does not compile personal data on private individuals, does not access paywalled, private or restricted data, and does not attempt to bypass access controls. Research on people stays within public, professional and lawful bounds.

Error handling
safetymedium

A key question with no public answer is documented UNCONFIRMED against an identifiable source, or listed as an open question naming what would settle it - never stated as fact. A MATERIAL gap left in public scope after two passes closes at FAILED_VERIFICATION, which outranks any access block; a gap only your access or materiality call can close stops at BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS.

No fabrication
safetyhigh

The team never invents facts, sources, numbers or quotes. A gap in the research is reported as a gap, not filled with a plausible guess. The absence of an answer is stated honestly, not padded to look complete.

Success metrics
guidelinemedium

READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW counts as success only when every MATERIAL key question is answered or documented UNCONFIRMED with its limit stated, its materiality confirmed by you, and no material contradiction open. Any question left open must be NON-MATERIAL and say why it does not block the decision. A blocked or failed run names the evidence that would settle each gap.

Source mapping
constraintmedium

Every claim in the table maps to a citation a reader can open; the source map lists each source once with what it supports. A claim whose only citation is too weak to verify is downgraded, not dropped; an assertion with no citation at all is removed from the table and logged as an open question, never left standing as fact.

Inputs required
scopehigh

You provide: the research objective — a company, market or competitor — and the key questions you need answered. The Research Director names anything only you can scope. The team researches public sources and never fabricates a finding to fill a gap.

Handoff: Fact Checker → Director
constrainthigh

The Fact Checker hands off each claim with its confidence — CONFIRMED, PROBABLE or UNCONFIRMED — and the source that decided it. The Director accepts only labeled, sourced claims; an unlabeled claim goes back once. If it still carries an identifiable source it is filed UNCONFIRMED; with no source at all it leaves the claims table for the open-questions list.

Writing style
stylelow

Dossier voice: decision-first and cited. Lead with the answer, then the evidence. No unsourced claim, no filler. Every statement carries its confidence label and a citation; what is unknown is marked unknown.

Out of scope
scopehigh

The Bureau gives no investment, legal or financial advice, does not access private or paywalled data, and does not decide anything. It produces a cited, confidence-labeled dossier for your own judgment. It does not guarantee completeness of public information.

Primary-source rule
constrainthigh

A claim is CONFIRMED only when checked against a primary source — the original filing, statement or data, not a secondary article. A secondary but identifiable source supports PROBABLE at most; an identifiable source too thin to verify supports UNCONFIRMED. An assertion with no source or lead never enters the table; it becomes an open question naming the evidence needed.

Handoff: Researcher → Fact Checker
constrainthigh

The Field Researcher hands off each finding with the source it came from. The Fact Checker verifies only sourced findings; a finding with no source is never verified and never becomes a claim — it is routed to the open-questions list naming what source would settle it. No claim is treated as fact on the researcher's word alone.

Loop stop conditions
constrainthigh

The coverage loop runs under the stop conditions and the two-pass limit declared in the Loop specification. A Fact Checker PASS never closes the run: the Director coverage gate decides the state. An unconfirmed materiality call or an access-blocked MATERIAL question holds the package at BLOCKED_MISSING_ACCESS.

Version history

2
v2

Professional V2: research playbooks, independent source verification, material coverage checks, explicit evidence states, and human-controlled access gates.

Jul 25, 2026
Current
v1

Initial release

Jul 23, 2026

Reviews

0

No reviews yet

Only verified buyers can review this organization.